Life is short, Smile while you still have teeth !
About Me
Friends
Local Business or Place » Hotel
What is Lorem Ipsum?
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown
Be the first person to like this
Anna Smith
Male
Lives in
Hồ Chí Minh
Be the first person to like this
Europol and Brexit: Will UK retain access to EU intelligence sharing?
The UK government's "future partnership" paper made a strong case for "a bespoke relationship with Europol" after the UK leaves the European Union.
It looked at the scenarios of:
no agreement being reached on future cooperation with Europol
current cooperation being wound down before a new arrangement was put in place
It said: "Consideration would need to be given to ensuring that any ongoing investigations would not be affected in such a way that criminals might escape prosecution or vulnerable individuals might be rendered less safe."
And it would be difficult to find anyone in the EU who would disagree with the importance of fighting cross-border crime.
EU funding
Europol, the European Union's law enforcement organisation, was founded in 1999 and employs more than 1,000 people at a cost of about £100m a year.
It is an EU-funded agency, and when the UK completes the Brexit process and no longer pays into the EU budget, it will cease to be a member.
The EU's chief negotiator, Michel Barnier, used an article in the French newspaper Le Monde to make it clear the UK could not continue to be a member.
He said: "The British defence minister will no longer be able to sit at the council of defence ministers, London will leave the European Defence Agency and Europol."
Inside Europol
Prime Minister Theresa May has previously said she wants the UK to retain its security co-operation with Europol post-Brexit.
And a number of countries that are not part of the EU, such as Norway, Switzerland and the US, have operational agreements with Europol that allow access to intelligence.
But Europol itself say this does not equate to formal membership, which means these countries do not have a say over operations and decisions.
Europol also points out that such agreements take a number of years to negotiate.
Image caption Every EU member state, plus 14 other nations, has staff in the Europol headquarters in The Hague
One precedent that might act as a future model is Denmark, an EU member but no longer in Europol.
In December 2015, Denmark voted in a referendum against more integration of security operations.
In May this year it formally left Europol, but an agreement was reached that allowed the Danish police and Europol to continue to share information and analysis.
Denmark is able to participate in Europol board meetings, but it has only "observer status" and no decision-making rights.
Could a similar agreement be made with the UK?
Europol seems to think not. In a statement, it said: "The agreement between both Denmark and Europol is based on the fact that Denmark is a full member of Schengen [group of countries that allow passport-free travel] and has implemented all EU data protection standards.
"It therefore allows for a sufficient level of co-operation, including the exchange of operational data and the deployment of liaison officers."
Prof Alan Woodward, a British cyber-crime expert and adviser to Europol, said the issue of the UK's future relationship with Europol needed to be resolved sooner rather than later.
"I very much hope that a solution is found to allow the UK to remain active participant with Europol - simply because it is in everybody's interest," he said.
"Europol is the best organisation to tackle cross-border law enforcement issues, especially in cyber-crime."
Be the first person to like this
Thomas salva
i am having some of <a href="https://www.voucherpro.co.uk/cyclesuk.com">cycles discount code</a> through you can enjoy this Valentine and can send gifts With Discount Coupon to any of your lover who is very angry with you.
-
Like
- February 12, 2021
Indoor cemeteries facing opposition from residents
TOKYO -- Buildings that store urns containing cremated ashes are growing in popularity as an alternative to traditional cemeteries in Japan, but laws are yet to be put in place to regulate where such facilities can be built, leading to protests from nearby residents.
The number of such facilities, often called "indoor cemeteries" by operators, has increased about 30% in the past decade in urban areas, where traditional cemeteries are in short supply.
Hidehiro Konno, who operates a pregnancy-care and birth clinic in Urayasu, Chiba Prefecture, plans to relocate the clinic because of an indoor cemetery being built in a tract adjacent to it. He tried to block the plan but failed.
It is a long-established, major clinic of its kind in the area, in operation for more than four decades and handling some 600 births a year.
The problem started with the demolition of an apartment building next to the clinic in April. Then the chief priest from a Buddhist temple in the city visited it and said the temple planned to build an indoor cemetery there.
Konno protested and asked the priest to consider what pregnant mothers would think when they saw a place associated with death, standing right next to the clinic. But the priest said the facility is legal.
Indoor cemeteries may be what the ageing society of Japan needs, as the number of deaths increases. In 2016, total deaths exceeded 1.3 million for the first time since the end of World War II.
Grave shortage
The shortage of graves is particularly serious in city areas, boosting demand for indoor cemeteries.
Operating or constructing cemeteries, mausoleums or crematoriums requires permission from local governments. These oversee such activities based on regulations in accordance with guidelines the national government worked out in 2000.
Be the first person to like this